What is Patient-Centered Maternity Care?
© 2012 by Rebecca Dekker, PhD, RN, APRN
A few months ago, I had a conversation with some hospital adminstrators about their hospital’s policies for the labor and delivery unit. As I listened to them explain some policies to me (I believe we were talking about visitor policies while a woman is giving birth), I was struck by how many times they used the phrases, “We might let a woman do this,” or “In some cases, we might allow a patient to do this, but only if they did this beforehand.” I couldn’t listen to it anymore. I held up my hand to indicate that I wanted to speak, and I said (very politefully, I hope!):
“I hate to interrupt you. But something you keep saying is really jumping out at me. You keep saying, ‘We might let a woman do this,’ or ‘We might allow a patient to do this.’ Excuse me? I am the patient. This is MY birth. I choose what I want to do, you don’t ‘LET’ me do anything!”
They sat there, and their eyes got really wide, and they just looked at me and then at each other. They looked quite surprised. I wondered if this thought had never crossed their minds before.
In the past week, I’ve been thinking a lot about birth and the concept of patient-centered care, and I wanted to share my thoughts with you on this topic.
But what does patient-centered care have to do with evidence-based care? Isn’t the purpose of this blog to discuss evidence-based birth?
In my birth detective post at the top of this website (where I list my research questions for this blog), I said that I wanted to explore the question, “What is the importance of the individual woman’s values when it comes to evidence-based birth?” This article is my attempt to answer that question.
The definition of Evidence-based maternity care is healthcare that is based on the latest, highest-quality evidence while also taking into account an individual woman’s values.
(New addition to this article: For those of you who are curious, I formulated my definition of evidence-based practice from here: the American Medical Association. Also, I have received some critique that the care provider’s judgment is not included in my definition. That’s because “evidence” ranges from systematic meta-analyses to single randomized trials to the individual care provider’s experience. I don’t mean to ignore or devalue the care provider’s experience in this. It is an important type of evidence, although you may be surprised to know that the AMA ranks unsystematic clinical observations as the weakest form of evidence on their hierarchy of evidence).
So by its very definition, evidence-based care is patient-centered. In this article, let’s explore a little bit about what patient-centered care means.
What does patient-centered care have to do with maternity care in the U.S.?
Patient-centered care is not a new concept in healthcare. In 1996, JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association) published an important paper by Laine and Davidoff that discussed the history of medicine in the United States. In this paper, the authors talked about how there has been a gradual shift in medicine from physician-centered care to patient-centered care. This shift has taken place at different times for different medical specialties.
In the beginning of the paper, the author gives an example of what physician-centered care may have looked like many years ago.
“During the 1930s my grandmother saw a specialist about a melanoma on her face. During the course of the visit when she asked him a question, he slapped her face, saying, ‘I’ll ask the questions here. I’ll do the talking.’ Can you imagine such an event occurring today? Melanomas may not have changed much in the last fifty years, but the profession of medicine has.” (Cassell, 1985).
The scary thing is, yes, I can imagine a similar situation happening today in maternity care. Physician-centered care might not manifest as a slap on the face, but perhaps as not fully disclosing the risks of a procedure, or scheduling a non-medically indicated induction rather than waiting for spontaneous labor to occur, or starting Pitocin augmentation so that the care provider can make it to a meeting, or threatening to force a woman (in full-blown labor) out of the hospital unless she consents to an unnecessary procedure, or a implementing a practice-wide ban on doulas (yes, a doula ban is in place in an obstetrics practice in Columbus, Ohio). Physician or hospital-centered care manifests itself when women who want vaginal births after Cesareans are not allowed a vaginal birth by their doctors and hospitals. Would you call these things physician-centered, hospital-centered, or medico-legal-centered? I certainly would not call them patient-centered.
So what is patient-centered care?
According to the Institute of Medicine, patient-centered care takes into consideration patients’ personal preferences, cultural traditions, values, families, and lifestyles. Patient-centered care empowers patients to be responsible for their self-care. It reduces the use of healthcare interventions that are unwanted, inappropriate, or not needed.
Another definition has been offered by Donald Berwick, the President of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement:
Patient centered-care includes transparency, individualization, recognition, respect, dignity, and choice in all matters– no exceptions– related to one’s person, circumstances, and relationships in health care. In other words, it is care that is wanted and needed provided at a time when it is wanted and needed.
I would argue that because the majority of pregnant women are not sick, they are not patients. Technically we should be talking about “woman-centered” care or “family-centered” maternity care. But for the purposes of simplicity, I will be using the medical term “patient-centered.”
What are the main components of patient-centered care?
In his classic speech on patient-centered care, Donald Berwick argued that patient-centered care can be boiled down to 3 simple principles:
- The needs of the patient come first.
- Nothing about me without me.
- Every patient is the only patient.
Let’s look at each one of these principles. How might they be violated in a Labor and Delivery setting?
1. The needs of the patient come first.
This principle would be violated if a woman desires to go into spontaneous labor, but her doctor pressures her into a (not medically indicated) induction at 40 weeks and 3 days. The woman later finds out that her doctor was planning a vacation for later that week. Whose needs came first?
2. Nothing about me without me.
This principle is a little bit harder to understand. It basically means that nothing should be going on with regard to my health and my body without my involvement or consent. When a woman enters a hospital labor and delivery unit, she frequently must submit to rigid rules. These rules are not negotiable and they are not open for discussion. “You are not allowed to eat or drink.” “We will not let you get out of bed now that your water has broken.” “You must wear the continuous electronic fetal monitor.” “You must have a saline lock in case of an emergency.” With these rigid rules, women in labor have lost control over basic bodily functions– including the ability to eat, drink, move, and sometimes even go to the toilet. There is a lot that is being done to her and about her without her.
3. Every patient is the only patient.
This principle is violated with “cookie cutter” obstetrical care. Upon entering a labor and delivery unit, a woman might be told to change into a hospital gown (thus labeling her as a “patient”) and restricted to hospital policies and procedures (many of which are not evidence-based). Her unique culture, values, and reasons for doing things are ignored. One example might be a woman who feels really strongly that she would like delayed cord clamping, but hospital routine prohibits it. Or a couple does not want to have their infant receive a bath right away, but the nurses take the baby away and do it anyways. Their reason for doing so? “Because that’s the way we always do things.” Or, “We have a rule that it has to be done this way.” Is that treating every patient like the only patient?
I looked at my hospital’s website. They say they provide “patient-centered care.” What does that mean?
Be cautious about hospitals that advertise themselves as providing patient-centered care. Just because they advertise it doesn’t always mean that is what they do. Of course there are some hospitals that provide excellent patient-centered maternity care. However, there are many others that use this term as a marketing ploy. They say, “At our hospital, the patient comes first!” but what they really mean is, “At our hospital, the patient comes first, but only after the hospital, doctors, midwives, nurses, residents, students, nursing assistants, cleaning staff, dietary workers, unit secretaries, billing clerks, lawyers, medical records personnel, security staff, and parking attendants.”
How can I tell if my chosen care provider or hospital provides patient-centered maternity care?
In an article on KevinMD.com, a former hospital administrator says that your care provider might provide patient-centered care if he or she:
- Knows your name
- Actively seeks, listens, and honors your opinion whenever humanly possible
- Treats you as the most important member of your health care team
- Educates you on how you can contribute to the overall success of your pregnancy and birth
- Sees you as someone who is actively involved in your own care and birth
- Other women tell you that this care provider really, truly listened to what they had to say
Of course, no matter how patient-centered your care provider is, you still have to deal with the place you are giving birth. Clues that your chosen place of birth might be patient-centered include (* items indicate those that have been endorsed by ACOG plus 6 other professional groups):
- There are no restrictions on how many visitors you have, except for restrictions chosen by you
- You are allowed to determine what you eat and drink and what clothing you wear in the hospital (to the extent that your health status allows)
- You are allowed freedom of mobility (to the extent that your health status allows)
- You participate in shared decision making, which means that you and your care team work together as partners to make fully informed decisions about your care*
- Decisions about interventions take into account your personal values and preferences and are made only after you have been given enough information to make an informed choice, in partnership with your care team*
Why don’t more care providers practice patient-centered maternity care?
One of the reasons I think we don’t see more patient-centered care in maternity care is because many care providers don’t really understand what patient-centered care is. When I was doing my research for this article, I found this essay by Dr. Kilpatrick, who is chairperson of OB/GYN at Cedars-Sinai in California, a large hospital that provides care for many birthing women. In her essay, she asks, “What does patient-centered care mean? Hasn’t the patient always been the focus of our attention?” She then goes on to say,
“If that is what patient-centered care means, I am all for it. The admission to labor and delivery is about her: We are there to take care of her, listen to her, talk to her, explain to her and her family the management plan because we made the management plan using our knowledge, our best judgment, and our compilation of the facts, and we incorporated her input in the process.” (italics mine)
She also states, “Most patients did not go to medical school and do a residency; most do not have
years of experience in taking care of other patients and of seeing bad and good
outcomes.”
Donald Berwick, President of the Institute of Healthcare Improvement, calls this type of viewpoint the classic “profession” perspective of patient care. People who adhere to this perspective think that we should give authority to the physician because they are the professional who always knows what is best for us. In other words, we should heed the physician when he or she says, “Trust me, I am a doctor, I know best what will help you.” But this perspective is not true patient-centered care, because it forgets that a woman knows herself, her values, her body, and her preferences far better than her doctor ever will. This perspective forgets that women are experts on themselves.
On the opposite side of the spectrum is the consumer-oriented perspective on patient care. In the consumer-oriented perspective, it is the patient, not the provider, who has all the authority. Sounds great, right? Well, not really. For example, consumer-oriented care would include giving a woman a vast menu of choices about birth. “You can decide– do you want to do an elective induction at 36, 37, 38, 39, or 40 weeks? Or do you want to wait to go into spontaneous labor? Or do you want a scheduled C-section?” This offering of unnecessary interventions (many of which could potentially cause harm) is not true patient-centered care.
In the end, true patient-centered care lies somewhere in the middle of these 2 extremes. In the middle, you will find Mr. Berwick’s summary of patient-centered care, which is “They give me exactly the help I need and want exactly when I need and want it.” This means that true patient-centered care is both necessary care and wanted care. You should never do something to a patient that they didn’t want. You should also never do something to a patient if they didn’t need it. The idea of patient-centered care is to put the patient and the provider on the same level. The patient and the provider are team players. They have different skills and different sets of expertise, but they are equals, nonetheless.
Unfortunately, many care providers equate “patient-centered care” with the “consumer-oriented” care. No wonder they don’t want to provide patient-centered care! Who would want to give up complete control of their medical practice? Who would want to be completely subservient to any and every patient demand? On the other hand, many care providers think that patient-centered care is similar to the “profession” perspective of patient care. In their case, they already believe they are practicing patient-centered care, when in fact their philosophy is not in line with true patient-centered care. But they don’t know that. They think that they are already providing patient-centered care. So why should they change?
In the end, perhaps if more care providers and hospitals understood the true meaning of patient-centered care and were trained in it, they wouldn’t be so opposed to implementing it.
So, in summary, what does patient-centered care have to do with evidence-based maternity care?
It has everything to do with evidence-based maternity care!
So what do you think? Tell us about some of your birth settings. Can you give any examples of when you received patient-centered care?
References:
- Berwick, D. M. (2009). “What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist.” Health Affairs 28(4): w555-565.
- Cassell, E. J. (1985). ”Talking with Patients.” In: The Theory of Dotor-Patient Communication (Vol.1). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
- Laine, C. and F. Davidoff (1996). “Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution.” Jama 275(2): 152-156.
- Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century: National Academies Press. Access the e-book for free here: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027.
Posted in: Evidence based practice
Leave a Comment: (13) →

Oh, my gosh, Rebecca, I read this on my phone and then raced to my computer. What an excellent article. This premise is exactly what I wrote about in “Take Back Your Birth” (http://thebestmomonearth.com/take-back-your-birth/)
[I started poking around about giving birth for the first time ... This was when I began hearing a phrase that absolutely astonished me: “They might let you…” – referring to what the medical staff may or may not allow in the labor and delivery room. ... I wasn’t talking about life-or-death decisions here.... I was amazed to find that the prevailing attitude was that, in all things, I needed the permission of my health provider, and that health providers varied widely in what they would or would not “allow.” ... That fact alone – the variation – told me that health and safety weren’t the issues. It was simply a matter of preference – the provider’s, not mine. What an odd concept, I thought. I’m an educated adult, and it is my body, my baby, and my birth. And, frankly, I’m a paying customer. Why on earth wouldn’t I get to make these decisions? The limit for me was finding out that “they might or might not” let me hold my own baby immediately after he was born, even in a non-emergency situation ... ]
In many cases, it is incredible how intelligent adults are treated in the maternity care system – and, unfortunately, the sometimes devastating effect it has on the birth experience for the mom and baby, which carries right through to the postpartum/newborn period when bonding, establishment of breastfeeding, and recovery are all occurring. From my own experience, I can say I felt like such a fish out of water during my pregnancy just because I asked questions and conducted myself like I would in real life, in the doctor’s office. The positive birth experience I had happened with health care provider #4, a midwife, after two doctors and another midwife.
There is much room for improvement in American maternity care.
What you’ve written is so important; I can’t wait to share it. Thanks again for the excellent research and insight!
You are right, Cristen! I loved your post on “take back your birth.” thank you so much for sharing your link! We need more women like you who to stand up for their basic human rights in childbirth.
Great piece! I was reminded of the book The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, which has nothing to do with maternity care and everything to do with taking the values and needs of the patient into consideration (about an Asian immigrant family struggling with their daughter’s epilepsy and the inability of the American medical system to respect or work with them effectively). The results of that particular case, while sad, show the dangers in following the “we’re the doctors, we tell you what to do” model as the presumed “safe” choice for patient care. I feel like patients, especially laboring women, are assumed to be ignorant and that it’s seen as “unsafe” to allow them to voice an opinion and direct the path of care in many cases–yet what happens when the “safe” choices directed by the doctor violate a woman’s beliefs and therefore hinder her physically and psychologically?
I feel like so much of this is subjective:
“This principle would be violated if a woman desires to go into spontaneous labor, but her doctor pressures her into a (not medically indicated) induction at 40 weeks and 3 days. The woman later finds out that her doctor was planning a vacation for later that week. Whose needs came first?”
Totally agree with this point. However, who is to say if it was “medically indicated” or not? What if the provider feels that it is and the patient does not? I agree that there are some clear-cut medical indications for induction, but there are also those that are not so clear (gestational diabetes controlled by oral meds; “low” fluid, but not oligo; chronic hypertension). In any of these cases, I may recommend an induction prior to 42 weeks gestation based on my opinion that it is medically indicated for THIS woman in THIS pregnancy, but what if the patient does not agree? Again, why it is so important to have a provider that you TRUST to make recommendations that are in the best interest of you and your baby. I also always discuss the possibility of refusing recommendations (I’m probably the only practice in town who has a form on hand for refusal of induction at 42 weeks).
“Of course, no matter how patient-centered your care provider is, you still have to deal with the place you are giving birth.”
To some extent, this is true. However, by finding a provider (most likely a CNM) who actually *attends* women in labor, as I do in my practice, your provider can often act as a buffer in between you and the hospital staff and policies. The truth of the matter is that the hospitals generally have fairly bare-bones policies in places, it’s the provider who is ordering things above and beyond that. For example, the hospital I attend deliveries at has policies for things like intermittent monitoring and water labor/water birth. However, if your provider orders continuous fetal monitoring and not getting out of the bed, or not “allowing” you to labor in the tub/shower, and will not catch a baby in the tub – what good are those policies to you? This is why I think it is SO important to find a provider who is on board with your plan for your labor and birth. The hospital and nurses are simply following orders from your provider. There are definitely hospitals that are more friendly to “out of the norm” requests than others, but it comes down to what your provider orders.
We have really lost sight in this country of the fact that we are attending women through one of the most important parts of their lives and that hospital procedure should not take precedence over a woman bonding skin-to-skin with her baby in the first hour(s) of life. It’s very sad.
However, I do think that as consumers, women should be more vocal with their opinions (in the form of money…i.e., where they choose to receive maternity care) and that is the only way that our system is ever going to actually change. Money talks. There are a lot of women out there who are begging (literally, begging) to be induced at 39 weeks (or before, although we do not do elective inductions prior to 39 weeks where I work and I fortunately do not have many women who want to be induced for any reason) and do not care about things like intermittent monitoring, unmedicated childbirth, kangaroo care, eating and drinking in labor. They don’t care when we tell them that an elective induction increases their risk of a cesarean section. I think that this (along with, of course, the apathy of most maternity providers) is what is behind the current state of affairs.
Excellent insights, Emily! I agree with you that the choice of care provider is usually more important than the choice of your birth setting. However, birth settings can use exert their power to try and “trump” a care provider– I have seen that done as well. A good example is here: http://evidencebasedbirth.com/2012/07/18/a-first-time-mom-shares-her-quest-for-evidence-based-fetal-monitoring/, where a mom wanted to decline and IV and have intermittent monitoring. Her care provider was supportive and acted as a buffer, but the hospital put up a fight (there policies were not supportive) and the mom ended up spending 3 hours in triage (in active labor!) waiting for the hospital lawyers and chairperson of OB to weigh in their opinions in the middle of the night. Fortunately the care provider was successful in facilitating this mom’s birth plan. But that kind of birth setting can be stressful for both moms and care providers who are trying to support them.
That is an interesting point about the apathy of some moms and care providers about things like kangaroo care and eating and drinking during labor. I wonder if anybody has ever done a study to determine what most women desire out of a childbirth experience? I would be curious to find out the statistics about how many women want elective inductions versus those who would prefer not to be induced. I have had other nurse midwives tell me similar stories– that they are seeing a lot of patients who are insisting on elective inductions.
I can only speak for myself, but my reason for wanting an elective induction was because I did not want to experience birth. It terrified me. I wanted to go to sleep quietly in a controlled environment, wake up with a baby, and have what I thought would be an easy recovery from abdominal stitches only. My OB did not direct me either way; she just said we shouldn’t be hasty, although she was willing to do it. It was only after I got a birth education that I realized what a mistake that would be, and I was able to overcome the fear of birth that had led me to that choice. That fear, however, was reinforced every time I visited the doctor (I eventually switched to a midwife, and then another midwife) and almost every time I spoke with another woman who had given birth as they recounted their horrific experiences. In a nutshell, I was ignorant about my options and made a decision out of fear. From what I’ve seen, many women are ignorant about their options, and there do not seem to be resources about birth in the typical OB’s office.
I love how you have so oversimplified maternity care in your article. How biased your point of view ! I would love to see how you would do as an obstetrician trying to navigate complex issues in labour, all the while catering to the patients every whim. And at the end, all must be perfect, or your patients will complain about you and possibly sue you. Often things are only ‘unnecessary ‘ in retrospect. Your article comes across as ignorant as far as I’m concerned.
Hi Dr. Tracy, I’m sorry if it came across as one-sided… although I am a healthcare professional, I am not an OB/GYN, I wrote this primarily from the perspective of a consumer, and I appreciate your perspective! I was reading your reviews on ratemds.com and it sounds like you provide very patient-centered care according to your patients’ own recommendations. My only guess is that you know your patient’s names, actively seek/listen/honor your patients’ opinions whenever possible, treat them as an important member of the healthcare team, educate them on how they can help contribute to the success of the pregnancy/birth, and see them as actively involved in their own care and birth. And I’m not being sarcastic. Because your patients speak so highly of you, my guess is that with them you are all of these things… and much more. Thanks for commenting!
Since my comment is ‘ awaiting moderation’ I can imagine that you are only posting comments that pat you on the back for your incredible insight.
I cringe at the word ‘patient’. Implies-illness, passive, paternalistic care and the patient just accepting. Client- implies partnership, acceptance, acknowledgment and informed person in the health system. I am a midwife.
I agree. The term ‘patient’ is a label for sick people in hospitals. In my ‘poststructuralist feminist’ midwifery practice the women are the ones in control. For me women are the true experts in childbirth because they have been childbearing for thousands and thousands of years simply because they have all the right equipment. Obstetricians on the other hand have been around for about 100 years. The results are high surgical intervention rates being routine because the wrong people are in control. Women just have to take back what is already theirs.
And yes, I do moderate my comments– 1) because I get spam, even with a spam filter, 2) I want to be able to respond immediately after publishing someone else’s comment if necessary, 3) I want to make sure that readers are not attacking each other personally. I know that I cannot possibly please 100% of people who read my articles, and I welcome constructive dialogue. I think in the end we are all interested in safe and quality care for moms and babies, and for good, satisfying work environments for care providers. We are all learning from each other and different viewpoints are okay, but please let’s be respectful here– no name-calling.